
Roland Barthes.
Animate / Inanimate.
1983.
Essay.
Continuing with my interest in the parallels between virtual idols and Bunraku theatre, I came across this essay from Roland Barthes in which he sets out some major points of difference between theatre in the Western tradition (stemming from Greek tragedy), and Bunraku theatre which operates within a Shinto & Buddhist tradition.
He characterises Western theatre as a practice which combines distinct elements such as the gaze, the voice and gesture towards synthesising totality, a self which is unified and stable. “A unity of movement and voice” (p. 59). By contrast, he observes that Bunraku takes these distinct components of theatre and explodes them further outwards in an act of abstraction, taking them closer to an ideal through scraps of “fragility, discretion, sumptuousness, unheard-of nuance, the abandonment of all triviality” (P. 60).
Reading this essay, it becomes clear why Bunraku was so appealing to a post-structuralist such as Barthes. The way in which it disrupts the understanding of the individual as a single, stable, whole and continuous self. Instead offering a model where the self is merely an effect of perception, arising from a volatile patchwork of raw inputs.
Barthes. R. (1983). Animate / Inanimate. In: Empire of Signs. Los Angeles, USA: Hill & Wang. pp. 58 – 60.
Categories: Avatars / Processed Voice





